Month: November 2019

Chhattisgarh HC to Baghel govt: What’s your objection on NIA probe into BJP MLA murder?

Source – newindianexpress.com RAIPUR: Chhattisgarh High Court has sought a clarification from the state government over its apparent objection in the probe to be carried out by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) into the murder of BJP MLA Bheema Mandavi. A division bench headed by the Chief Justice PR Ramachandra Menon and Justice PP Sahu

No, the Supreme Court did not uphold the claim that Babri Masjid was built by demolishing a temple.

Source – Two intertwined contentions drove the Ramjanmabhoomi movement three decades ago. The first was religious: supporters claimed that the central dome of the Babri Masjid in the Uttar Pradesh town of Ayodhya marked the exact spot where the Hindu god Ram had been born. The mosque was built on the Ramjanmabhoomi or birthplace of

Has the Delhi High Court effectively asked intermediaries to track user location data?

Source – medianama.com On 23rd October, 2019 the Delhi High Court passed a judgement on whether content take-down and blocking orders passed by it would be global in nature or would they be limited to operating in the territory of India. The court concluded that for content which was uploaded from India, they could direct global takedowns and

Five Judges of Supreme Court who Delivered the Ayodhya Verdict.

Source – sentinelassam.com NEW DELHI: A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court delivered its verdict in Ayodhya’s Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case on Saturday. The land dispute verdict was delivered by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde, Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud. * Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi,

The Curious Case of the 1,045-Page Ayodhya Judgment With Its Mystery Author and Dissenting Opinion.

Source – news18.com New Delhi: Apart from the order itself, two features of the judgment delivered by the five-judge bench in the Ayodhya title dispute have stood out. First, it does not specify the name of the judge(s) who authored the judgment. And secondly, the unanimous judgment does not mention the name of the judge who dissented on the issue

Read how leftist historians had accepted they argued against Ram Mandir in Allahabad High Court without any knowledge of the subject.

Source – opindia.com The long-awaited judgment in the Ayodhya dispute was finally delivered on Saturday, the 9th of November, 2019. The Supreme Court verdict paved the way for a Bhavya Ram Mandir at Ram Janmabhoomi. Following the verdict, liberals had a meltdown on social media, as expected. There was good reason for this meltdown on social media. For long,