HC annuls election of Azam Khan’s son Abdullah as Suar MLA.

Source – indiatoday.in

In a jolt to Rampur MP Mohmmad Azam Khan, the Allahabad High Court on Monday annulled the election of senior SP leader’s son Mohammad Abdullah Azam Khan as an Uttar Pradesh MLA on the ground that he was underage and not qualified to fight the poll in 2017.

A bench of Justice S P Kesarwani declared the election of juniour Khan from the Suar assembly segment null and void on a plea by the defeated BSP candidate, Nawab Kazim Ali Khan.

Allowing Kazim Khan’s election petition, the bench ruled that Abdullah Azam Khan was not qualified to contest the election of the legislative assembly as he had not yet turned 25 when he the filled nomination paper for the assembly election in 2017.

In his election petition against Abdullah Khan, Kazim Khan had contended that the elected MLA’s actual date of birth was January 1, 1993 and not September 30,1990, as claimed in the nomination paper.

Accordingly, he was yet to reach 25 years of age to become eligible to fight the election, when he filed the nomination papers on January 25, 2017, Kazim Khan had contended.

Abdullah Khan was elected as MLA from Suar constituency of Rampur district in Uttar Pradesh on a Samajwadi Party ticket on March 11, 2017.

The unsuccessful Bahujan Samaj Party’s candidate from the Suar assembly segment, Kazim Khan, had further pointed out in his election petition that educational certificates, passport and visa of Abdullah Khan mentioned January 1, 1993 as his date of birth.

But in his nomination papers, Abdullah Khan had mentioned September 30, 1990 as his birth date on the basis of a certificate from Lucknow’s Birth and Death registrar.

The bench unseated the Suar MLA after examining entire fact as borne out of various documents, including Abdullah Khan’s mother service record, which too had mentioned January 1, 1993.

Placing special reliance on the service book of Abdullah Khan mother, Tazeen Fatima, a former Rajya Sabha MP, Justice Kesarwani said in his , and in his 49-page judgement that it was an “admitted piece of evidence”.

In its ruling unseating the Suar MLA, the court directed the high court’s registrar general to intimate the substance of the verdict to the Election Commission of India and the Uttar Pradesh legislative assembly’s speaker to take follow-up actions.

To buttress his contention, Kazim Khan, a four-time MLA from Suar, had contended that Azam Khan’s son had filed false documents in support of his age.

Earlier at one stage, Abdullah Khan’s mother appeared as a witness before the court and contended that her son was born on September 30, 1990 as can be seen by her service records, registering the fact that she had taken the maternity leave in 1990 when Abdullah was born.

The court, however, rejected her claim.

Besides her, Dr Uma Singh, a senior gynecologist of Queen Mary’s Hospital, Gandhi Memorial and associated Hospitals and that of K G Medical College, Lucknow, also appeared in court as witness.

After recording statement of all witnesses and having heard the arguments of all sides, the court had reserved its judgment on September 27, 2019.