Below is a judgement passed by Supreme Court for a person who was not convicted in 304B but was convicted in 498A. Supreme Court: We set aside the conviction of the appellant under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). The conviction under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is

By Rakesh Shukla What is the law’s position on maintenance for the wife and children, after a divorce? What happens if the courts take years to arrive at a final decision regarding maintenance? Can the wife and children avail of interim maintenance during pendency of the proceedings? Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure   Code

By Rakesh Shukla In this case of granting a divorce on grounds of mental cruelty by the wife, the Supreme Court seems to have gone out of its way to change the parameters of what constitutes mental cruelty on the part of the woman. It could have far-reaching consequences for future cases [IMG]/images/july12/mental_cruelty.jpg[/IMG] The courts

Home [I had taken good care of you. why you people(wife and in-laws) are trying to do injustice to me?  I had purchased what ever you wanted.I had done cooking for you. When you were pregnant i purchased a car for you because the bike journey is not good when you were pregnant. You and

Source-http://m.timesofindia.com/city/gurgaon/Techie-parents-booked-for-wifes-death/articleshow/44472875.cms BHOPAL: Some months ago, Divyendu, 28 (name changed) was struggling with his unsuccessful marriage and wanted a divorce. Now, he faces a dowry harassment charge and an extremely difficult task of arranging Rs 15 lakh. His wife has threatened to ruin his life and the only way he can save himself is by arranging

If you are suffering in anxiety you have 2 choices. Giving in to it or learning to live with it. Giving into it also means that your partner will suffer the burden of your fears so, to make your lives a better place to be, try to find some ways to eliminate or at least limit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH (INDORE BENCH)Civil Revision No. 1290/99 Decided On: 24.03.2000Appellants: Smt. Mamta Jaiswal Vs. Respondent: Rajesh JaiswalHon’ble Judges:J.G. Chitre, J. Counsels:For Appellant/Petitione r/Plaintiff: S.A. Mev, Adv.For Respondents/ Defendant: S.K. Nigam, Adv. Acts/Rules/Orders:Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Sections 24 and 26Disposition:Revision dismissedORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Heard. The petitioner Mamta Jaiswal has acquired

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 201 Of 2006 Smt. Archana Gupta & Another ………….. Revisionists. Versus Sri Rajeev Gupta & Another ………….Respondents Mr. M.K. Goyal, learned counsel for the revisionists. Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, learned counsel for respondent no. 1. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned A.G.A. for respondent no. 2. Dated:

Rejecting a woman’s plea for maintenance from her estranged husband, metropolitan magistrate Pooja Talwar said: “The complainant is a well-educated lady who had been earning approximately Rs 50,000 per month from her last job. If she has chosen not to work… she cannot be permitted to take advantage of her own deed.” The court, which

An educated woman who is capable of maintaining herself but quits her job voluntarily, is not entitled to alimony from her estranged husband, the Delhi High Court has held. Justice Pratibha Rani dismissed the woman’s plea, which had challenged a lower court’s order denying her maintenance on the ground that she was well-qualified and working